Cigna is the most recent insurer to cease contributions to some federal lawmakers following the riot on the Capitol final week.
Cigna mentioned in an e-mail that its political motion committee will “discontinue help of any elected official who inspired or supported violence, or in any other case hindered a peaceable transition of energy.”
Cigna’s announcement is on the heels of Blue Cross and Blue Protect, which vowed to cease political contributions to lawmakers who voted to object electoral faculty outcomes from the presidential election following a riot on the Capitol. Different insurers and healthcare organizations are both reviewing their insurance policies for political contributions or pausing them completely.
Cigna’s political motion committee spent $2.5 million this election cycle, in accordance with the Heart for Responsive Politics. Of these funds, about $535,000 was given to Democrats and $458,000 to Republicans.
In its assertion, Cigna added it would proceed to judge its political contributions going ahead.
“There’s by no means any justification for violence or the sort of destruction that occurred on the U.S. Capitol final week, a constructing that stands as a robust image of the very democracy that makes our nation robust,” Cigna mentioned.
Equally, UnitedHealth Group is pausing all political contributions presently, in accordance with a spokesman. He mentioned United will likely be reviewing its federal contributions “to verify they align with the values of the corporate.”
UnitedHealth’s political motion committee has spent about $four.5 million this election cycle. Of that, about $526,500 went to Democrats and $656,000 went to Republicans.
A spokesperson at Centene Corp. mentioned it will likely be taking this subject into consideration earlier than it makes any contributions.
CVS Well being, which owns insurer Aetna, mentioned future political contributions at the moment are below overview, in accordance with a spokesperson.
America’s Well being Insurance coverage Plans, which represents well being insurers, is now reviewing its insurance policies for political contributions, CEO Matt Eyles mentioned in an announcement.
“Our nation, the legal guidelines of our land, and the protection of our residents and the political leaders who serve them, are paramount. These priorities will likely be entrance and middle as we instantly overview our insurance policies governing political giving,” he mentioned.
AHIP spent $342,000 this election cycle, in accordance with the Heart for Responsive Politics. About $143,500 went to Democrats and $127,500 went to Republicans.
The American Hospital Affiliation can also be presently reviewing its political contribution practices “to make sure they’re guided by our affiliation’s imaginative and prescient and mission in addition to the democratic values we share as a nation.” The AHA spent $three.three million this election time period, with $756,800 going to Democrats and $408,000 to Republicans.
The American Medical Affiliation’s political motion committee would not have any contributions deliberate presently, however a spokesman mentioned the committee’s board “rigorously deliberates and considers all contribution selections.” Discussions will happen on the frequently scheduled assembly of the AMA’s political motion committee, he mentioned.
The AMA’s PAC spent $1.7 million this election cycle, with $533,000 going to Democrats and $397,000 to Republicans.